
|
Abu-Jamal
RE: cindy sheehan email
|

|
Reply
|

|
7/3/2006 1:40 PM
|

|

|

|
Abu-Jamal will not stand by while he is insulted by any references that discredit our founder John Africa. We are in a struggle that demands allegiance. Break those shackles of White America and join us Brothers! Turn your hearts and minds to Mother Africa and honor your heritage and ancestry. Do not be deceived by vile lies about our cause and destiny to take our rightful place in history.
|

|
|

|

|
Fred_Barnett
RE: cindy sheehan email
|

|
Reply
|

|
7/3/2006 1:40 PM
|

|

|

|
I'm just curious Chicklet- since I haven't been checking the site on regular basis I don't remember your particular viewpoint:
In your mind, was this a just war? One that was necessary for "our freedom"?
|

|
|

|

|
Seth in 736
RE: cindy sheehan email
|

|
Reply
|

|
7/3/2006 1:46 PM
|

|

|

|
Exhibit A
|

|
|

|

|
Seth in 736
RE: cindy sheehan email
|

|
Reply
|

|
7/3/2006 1:49 PM
|

|

|

|
Cmon, a little more, a little more....
|

|
|

|

|
Seth in 736
RE: cindy sheehan email
|

|
Reply
|

|
7/3/2006 1:54 PM
|

|

|

|
AHHH! THIS IS GREAT!
Cmon toolbag, call me Juggy, or Mr Shorty pants!!
This couldnt be goin better if you were ransacking a VFW~!
|

|
|

|

|
Dean-o
RE: cindy sheehan email
|

|
Reply
|

|
7/3/2006 1:55 PM
|

|

|

|
I love this place.
|

|
|

|

|
Seth in 736
RE: cindy sheehan email
|

|
Reply
|

|
7/3/2006 1:56 PM
|

|

|

|
It should be a pay site.
|

|
|

|

|
Fred_Barnett
RE: cindy sheehan email
|

|
Reply
|

|
7/3/2006 1:57 PM
|

|

|

|
I WAS RIGHT.
I KNEW that Stonewall was SLY. Just could tell after one of his prior posts, it had to be him...
Credit, please.
|

|
|

|

|
Seth in 736
RE: cindy sheehan email
|

|
Reply
|

|
7/3/2006 1:58 PM
|

|

|

|
Tip o the cap to ya!
WHAT
A
TOOL
|

|
|

|

|
Seth in 736
RE: cindy sheehan email
|

|
Reply
|

|
7/3/2006 1:59 PM
|

|

|

|
Not you, Sly/Stonewall/Art/Desi/Friendless Douche who cant spell
|

|
|

|

|
Fred_Barnett
RE: cindy sheehan email
|

|
Reply
|

|
7/3/2006 1:59 PM
|

|

|

|
He's probably Jim Crow and the Reaper as well...
YOU DICKLESS PUNK
|

|
|

|

|
Seth in 736
RE: cindy sheehan email
|

|
Reply
|

|
7/3/2006 1:59 PM
|

|

|

|
(I'm rippin on spellin?)
Oh, it's clearly a Friday around here and the line has been DRAWN!
|

|
|

|

|
chicklet
RE: cindy sheehan email
|

|
Reply
|

|
7/3/2006 2:00 PM
|

|

|

|
In your mind, was this a just war? One that was necessary for "our freedom"?
Not our freedom necessarily (don't we already have that?) but our safety, definately.
|

|
|

|

|
Seth in 736
RE: cindy sheehan email
|

|
Reply
|

|
7/3/2006 2:01 PM
|

|

|

|
Funny too, since ive cited it before, but Sly likes to CONVENIENTLY call people out for biggoted remarks (NEAG & I in the "Guido thread circa 2003) but he is all about it with his 'other names'.
Enjoy the 4th pal! Are all your buds comin over for a cookout?
Make sure to put out an extra setting for 'Art'- the newest addition to your list of freinds.
|

|
|

|

|
chicklet
RE: cindy sheehan email
|

|
Reply
|

|
7/3/2006 2:02 PM
|

|

|

|
I WAS RIGHT.
I KNEW that Stonewall was SLY. Just could tell after one of his prior posts, it had to be him...
Credit, please.
Do men love to be right, or what?
What's with the need for credit??
Do you know how many times a day I hear "But don't I at least get credit for ... (insert meaningless activity here)???"
|

|
|

|

|
Seth in 736
RE: cindy sheehan email
|

|
Reply
|

|
7/3/2006 2:08 PM
|

|

|

|
Actually FB, I also called this one.
Not hard, he has the market cornered on isolationist, mad at the world, defense mechanism driven "humor".
Sly- Im grinning ear to ear here. Thanks for the great day, and your further humiliation.
|

|
|

|

|
Dean-o
RE: cindy sheehan email
|

|
Reply
|

|
7/3/2006 2:09 PM
|

|

|

|
Freddie wrote following uber's reply, ...
"DSLY, I STAND CORRECTED!
BUT YOU'RE STILL A BIATCH!
And I know that Josh isn't smart enough to come up with those names, so..."
Dude, (FB), ... you get credit for nothing. You didn't know that it was D-sly.
|

|
|

|

|
Seth in 736
RE: cindy sheehan email
|

|
Reply
|

|
7/3/2006 2:10 PM
|

|

|

|
I love Dean O.
Thats hilarious.
Either way, who cares? SLY'S BEEN BUSTED YET AGAIN (And not talkin bout the Missus catchin him in the garage with a NYPD Calendar and bottle - o - lube)
|

|
|

|

|
Dean-o
RE: cindy sheehan email
|

|
Reply
|

|
7/3/2006 2:13 PM
|

|

|

|
This exchange / ousting simply reminds me of being a young lad when my Dad took me fishing for the very first time; I said, “Dad, where are all the fish? You can’t see any fish in here.” Dad simply said, “just throw your hook in the water son, if there are fish in this hole, they’ll bite.”
Lack
Of
Discipline
|

|
|

|

|
Seth in 736
RE: cindy sheehan email
|

|
Reply
|

|
7/3/2006 2:13 PM
|

|

|

|
Check this out! Some masochistic crap right here-
When Sly's bein called out earlier (pg8) and the call went up for the pics-
Stonewall joins in:
Stonewall Jackson
RE: cindy sheehan email
6/30/2006 1:45 PM
I agree with EG. Hell we seen drunken gg-go-rumple pics lets see drunken sly pics.
PICS
PICS
PICS
|

|
|

|

|
Johnson
RE: cindy sheehan email
|

|
Reply
|

|
7/3/2006 2:14 PM
|

|

|

|
Hmmmm...
I had a hunch that Daddysly and Stonewall were not one in the same. I checked the user name and sure enough there is no IP match between the two names.
But the name I suspected was there.
I'm not gonna say because I don't want to spoil their fun but I do want to spare us the obscenity laden tirade that Daddysly will drop upon us for being falsely accused.
Stonewall ? Daddysly
|

|
|

|

|
Fred_Barnett
RE: cindy sheehan email
|

|
Reply
|

|
7/3/2006 2:15 PM
|

|

|

|
You're hilarious DSly.
If it was anybody else, I might be a little pissed.
But you've shown yourself to be a
C-H-U-M-P so it doesn't even bother me.
Talk away, crybaby; change your names up "Stroker Ace"- nobody knows it you!
And at least this way you don't need to WHIMPER in your old lady's chest like a 50 Forest Gump!
HA HA!
|

|
|

|

|
Johnson
RE: cindy sheehan email
|

|
Reply
|

|
7/3/2006 2:16 PM
|

|

|

|
"Stonewall ? Daddysly"
That question mark is supposed to be a "Not Equal To" symbol.
Damned special characters!
|

|
|

|

|
chicklet
RE: cindy sheehan email
|

|
Reply
|

|
7/3/2006 2:16 PM
|

|

|

|
I'm not gonna say because I don't want to spoil their fun but I do want to spare us the obscenity laden tirade that Daddysly will drop upon us for being falsely
accused.
Isn't he more likely than NOT to drop an obscenity laden tirade no matter WHAT? Isn't that what he DOES?
|

|
|

|

|
Fred_Barnett
RE: cindy sheehan email
|

|
Reply
|

|
7/3/2006 2:17 PM
|

|

|

|
That's 50 year old Forest Gump!
HA AAH HA!!!!
|

|
|

|
|
|