
|
f-dallas
Key ingredient in Super Bowl team? Add white players.
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/18/2007 1:20 PM
|

|

|

|
So says this article:
http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/7343980?MSNHPHMA
You get one NFL Truth today. Watching Chad Johnson and Larry Johnson undermine their respective head coaches, Marvin Lewis and Herm Edwards, on Sunday gave me a singular focus, forced me to contemplate an uncomfortable truth.
African-American football players caught up in the rebellion and buffoonery of hip hop culture have given NFL owners and coaches a justifiable reason to whiten their rosters. That will be the legacy left by Chad, Larry and Tank Johnson, Pacman Jones, Terrell Owens, Michael Vick and all the other football bojanglers.
In terms of opportunity for American-born black athletes, they're going to leave the game in far worse shape than they found it.
It's already starting to happen. A little-publicized fact is that the Colts and the Patriots — the league's model franchises — are two of the whitest teams in the NFL. If you count rookie receiver Anthony Gonzalez, the Colts opened the season with an NFL-high 24 white players on their 53-man roster. Toss in linebacker Naivote Taulawakeiaho "Freddie" Keiaho and 47 percent of Tony Dungy's defending Super Bowl-champion roster is non-African-American. Bill Belichick's Patriots are nearly as white, boasting a 23-man non-African-American roster, counting linebacker Tiaina "Junior" Seau and backup quarterback Matt Gutierrez.
For some reason, these facts are being ignored by the mainstream media. Could you imagine what would be written and discussed by the media if the Yankees and the Red Sox were chasing World Series titles with 11 African-Americans on their 25-man rosters (45 percent)?
We would be inundated with information and analysis on the social significance. Well, trust me, what is happening with the roster of the Patriots and the Colts and with Roger Goodell's disciplinary crackdown are all socially significant.
Hip hop athletes are being rejected because they're not good for business and, most important, because they don't contribute to a consistent winning environment. Herm Edwards said it best: You play to win the game.
I'm sure when we look up 10 years from now and 50 percent — rather than 70 percent — of NFL rosters are African-American, some Al Sharpton wannabe is going to blame the decline on a white-racist plot.
That bogus charge will ignore our role in our football demise. We are in the process of mishandling the opportunity and freedom earned for us by Jim Brown, Walter Payton, Doug Williams, Mike Singletary, Gale Sayers, Willie Lanier and countless others. And those of us in the media who have rationalized, minimized and racialized every misstep by Vick, Pacman and T.O. have played an equal role in blowing it.
By failing to confront and annihilate the abhorrent cultural norms we have allowed to grab our youth, we have in the grand American scheme sentenced many of them to hell on earth (incarceration), and in the sports/entertainment world we've left them to define us as unreliable, selfish and buffoonish.
I take you to Arrowhead Stadium this past Sunday when two competent and respected black head coaches led the Chiefs and the Bengals in battle, and their efforts were periodically sabotaged by Chad and Larry Johnson, the two players Lewis and Edwards have defended the most.
Football fans are aware of Lewis' love affair with Chad Johnson, the Flavor Flav of the gridiron. Johnson's insistence on conducting a minstrel show during games has long been reluctantly tolerated by Lewis. Johnson, I guess, is just too talented, productive and well-compensated for Lewis to discipline. So Lewis has chosen to enable, going as far as making excuses when Johnson's selfish behavior extended to an alleged locker-room shoving match with coaches (including a swing at Lewis) at halftime of the Bengals' Jan. 8, 2006 playoff loss to the Steelers.
Coming off an 11-5 regular season and having been crowned the toast of Cincinnati, Lewis responded to that Johnson meltdown by vowing to cut the player who leaked the fight information to the media.
Since then, the Bengals have been one of the league's biggest disappointments, finishing 8-8 last season and starting 1-4 this season. Injuries have played a significant role in Cincy's troubles, but so has a lack of on- and off-field discipline and focus. Lewis' coddling of Chad Johnson has destroyed the chemistry that made the Bengals a playoff team in 2005.
On Sunday, with the Bengals trying to rally out of a two-score deficit, Johnson failed to finish a pass route, which contributed to Carson Palmer throwing an interception.
Not to be outdone, Larry Johnson continued his season-long pattern of immature behavior, spiking the football in frustration with 4 minutes to play and the Chiefs attempting to run out the clock. The Bengals were out of timeouts and the spike stopped the clock, giving Cincy one last chance to make a comeback.
Johnson, despite receiving a new $45-million contract, has brooded, pouted and complained all season. He spent the off-season promising to be a leader and has spent the first six weeks of the season spreading locker-room cancer. Edwards-coached teams have traditionally been the least-penalized squads in the NFL. This year's Chiefs are one of the most-penalized squads. Nickel back Benny Sapp drew an unsportsmanlike conduct penalty on Sunday, had to be dragged off the field by Donnie Edwards, and was spotted on the sideline arguing with players and coaches.
Race is not the determining factor when it comes to having a good or bad attitude. Culture is.
Hip hop is the dominant culture for black youth. In general, music, especially hip hop music, is rebellious for no good reason other than to make money. Rappers and rockers are not trying to fix problems. They create problems for attention.
That philosophy, attitude and behavior go against everything football coaches stand for. They're in a constant battle to squash rebellion, dissent and second opinions from their players.
You know why Muhammad Ali is/was an icon? Because he rebelled against something meaningful and because he excelled in an individual sport. His rebellion didn't interfere with winning. Jim Brown, Bill Russell, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, etc. rebelled with dignity and purpose.
What we're witnessing today are purposeless, selfish acts of buffoonery. Sensible people have grown tired of it. Football people are recognizing it doesn't contribute to a winning environment.
Whether calculated or not, the Patriots and the Colts have created settings in which Brady and Manning can lead and feel comfortable. I remember back in the 1980s when some black sports fans accused the Celtics of being racist for having a predominantly-white roster when Larry Bird was the star. No one remembered that Red Auerbach occasionally fielded an all-black starting lineup during Bill Russell's heyday.
My point is that it makes sense to cater to your stars. And it makes even more sense to fill your roster with players who don't mind being led, even if you sacrifice a little 40-yard dash speed.
If things don't change quickly, we're going to learn this lesson the hard way.
|

|
|

|

|
slapshot
RE: Key ingredient in Super Bowl team? Add white players.
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/18/2007 1:29 PM
|

|

|

|
Whitlock is pretty much on the money. However, if he were a WHITE writer, the NAACP, Al, Jesse, et al would be be calling for his job.
|

|
|

|

|
f-dallas
RE: Key ingredient in Super Bowl team? Add white players.
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/18/2007 1:31 PM
|

|

|

|
Not sure what this means, but I knew who wrote the article by the first paragraph.
|

|
|

|

|
Fred_Barnett
RE: Key ingredient in Super Bowl team? Add white players.
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/18/2007 1:36 PM
|

|

|

|
I wish he'd quit trying to blame everything on rap music.
And another thing: his statement that "No one remembered that Red Auerbach occasionally fielded an all-black starting lineup during Bill Russell's heyday."
Idiotic. Most people who know anything about the NBA know that Red was the first to draft a black player AND field an all black starting lineup.
IMO, Jason is trying too hard. Not saying that he's completely wrong, but he's not totally on the mark either.
|

|
|

|

|
TheHulk_NJ
RE: Key ingredient in Super Bowl team? Add white players.
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/18/2007 1:46 PM
|

|

|

|
I'm sure there is a white RB somewhere doing cartwheels over this article.
|

|
|

|

|
f-dallas
RE: Key ingredient in Super Bowl team? Add white players.
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/18/2007 1:46 PM
|

|

|

|
Leapin' Leonard!
|

|
|

|

|
NotoriousEAG
RE: Key ingredient in Super Bowl team? Add white players.
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/18/2007 1:48 PM
|

|

|

|
Josh Parry is sitting by the phone like someone who's waiting for a ransom demand from his child's kidnapper.
|

|
|

|

|
TheHulk_NJ
RE: Key ingredient in Super Bowl team? Add white players.
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/18/2007 1:50 PM
|

|

|

|
Look we let Wes Welker and Kevin Curtis play WR. "You people" are never satisfied.
|

|
|

|

|
bassiladelph
RE: Key ingredient in Super Bowl team? Add white players.
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/18/2007 1:51 PM
|

|

|

|
I like how he pointed out Herm and Lewis, even though a)they've both been revealed as being overrated, and b)they're the only ones these days to deal with prima donnas.
Had he mentioned Art Shell and Jerry Porter, it would've made his argument that much better. And it's not as if LJ being a baby wasn't public knowledge.
|

|
|

|

|
bassiladelph
RE: Key ingredient in Super Bowl team? Add white players.
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/18/2007 1:52 PM
|

|

|

|
Is there some type of Affirmative Action for white WRs? Because I thought I saw Ricky Proehl's name somewhere...
|

|
|

|

|
f-dallas
RE: Key ingredient in Super Bowl team? Add white players.
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/18/2007 1:54 PM
|

|

|

|
Look we let Wes Welker and Kevin Curtis play WR. "You people" are never satisfied.
You couldn't let us have Bloom, could you?
|

|
|

|

|
NotoriousEAG
RE: Key ingredient in Super Bowl team? Add white players.
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/18/2007 1:55 PM
|

|

|

|
Tim Dwight is available
|

|
|

|

|
TheHulk_NJ
RE: Key ingredient in Super Bowl team? Add white players.
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/18/2007 2:00 PM
|

|

|

|
NEAG,
NTFF!!!
|

|
|

|

|
Seth in 736
RE: Key ingredient in Super Bowl team? Add white players.
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/18/2007 2:01 PM
|

|

|

|
Is this Whitlocks 1st good article?
And again, I'll go onto say that his central theme I think is DEAD ON, but being Whitlock, its wordy, loses its point amidst some inaccuracies as someone noted, etc so....
|

|
|

|

|
Fred_Barnett
RE: Key ingredient in Super Bowl team? Add white players.
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/18/2007 2:05 PM
|

|

|

|
Ok Seth, I'll bite.
You agree with his premise that rap music is a primary culprit?
Guess what type of music Marvin Harrison and Ladainian Tomlinson (among MANY sane black others) prefer...
I guess we ought to blame the Cure (I mean Marilyn Manson) for Columbine...
|

|
|

|

|
bassiladelph
RE: Key ingredient in Super Bowl team? Add white players.
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/18/2007 2:09 PM
|

|

|

|
There's an issue, but there's a raging against the machine that wasn't prevalent in the days of those Whitlock mentioned. To single one aspect of the culture without singling out other factors (such as athletes can get away with much more these days, because teams make no money off them when they're sitting on the sidelines).
There's a lack of authority all over, not just in basketball and football.
|

|
|

|

|
bassiladelph
RE: Key ingredient in Super Bowl team? Add white players.
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/18/2007 2:10 PM
|

|

|

|
To single out one aspect of the culture is foolish, I mean.
|

|
|

|

|
Dino727
RE: Key ingredient in Super Bowl team? Add white players.
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/18/2007 2:14 PM
|

|

|

|
FB, Not sure he's specifically blaming the MUSIC.
Race is not the determining factor when it comes to having a good or bad attitude. Culture is.
Hip hop is the dominant culture for black youth.
That said, he's taking a pretty big leap using the Johnson's as a basis for his whole argument. AS you said, there are plenty of "good apples" both Black & White who like hip hop.
|

|
|

|

|
munchdaddy
RE: Key ingredient in Super Bowl team? Add white players.
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/18/2007 2:16 PM
|

|

|

|
Dead on bass.
This is much more a cultural issue than a race issue.
There are white players who are the same kind of "bafoons".
|

|
|

|

|
TheHulk_NJ
RE: Key ingredient in Super Bowl team? Add white players.
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/18/2007 2:21 PM
|

|

|

|
To say adding more white players and having less rap music will equal more SB rings for teams is the most ridiculious thing I have ever heard.
The same has been said of blues, jazz, and rock which was considered "colored people" at one time.
|

|
|

|

|
TheHulk_NJ
RE: Key ingredient in Super Bowl team? Add white players.
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/18/2007 2:25 PM
|

|

|

|
"colored people music"*
|

|
|

|

|
Fred_Barnett
RE: Key ingredient in Super Bowl team? Add white players.
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/18/2007 2:26 PM
|

|

|

|
What I want to know is: Why does Whitlock even care? Obviously he enjoys sitting on his throne and pointing down at "those" people and judging without taking into account that maybe rule-breaking and a certain "wildness" was the way these people survived their broken childhoods. Maybe instead of wagging his finger, he should waddle his fat ass down to his local congressman's office and push for change in his own decrepit inner city. Then maybe if they stop growing up in the jungle they'll stop acting like animals.
|

|
|

|

|
munchdaddy
RE: Key ingredient in Super Bowl team? Add white players.
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/18/2007 2:27 PM
|

|

|

|
I think there is a distinction between hip hop culture and hip hop music.
|

|
|

|

|
NotoriousEAG
RE: Key ingredient in Super Bowl team? Add white players.
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/18/2007 2:29 PM
|

|

|

|
Fred did you joing the 10000 men Philly organization?
|

|
|

|

|
bassiladelph
RE: Key ingredient in Super Bowl team? Add white players.
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/18/2007 2:33 PM
|

|

|

|
I think there is a distinction between hip hop culture and hip hop music.
But to those that don't know, they're one in the same. And those who don't know about one are only limited (and only care about) the images they see in the other. Every flavor-of-the-month video does more to harm the image than restore it to its original roots.
And that's how it gets derided and abused, despite having positive role models over the years.
|

|
|

|
|
|