Promote your business or product on 700level.com. For
more information about advertising with us CLICK HERE!

Utterly shocking that you can't stay on topic

YO! EL STUPIDO!
THE EFFIN THREAD'S CALLED 'LIGHTEN UP THE LEVEL!!"

YOU EFFIN JACKASS! YOU COULDNT STAY ON TOPIC, WITH YOUR TYPICAL OVER SERIOUS ANALYSIS OF SOMETHING, IN THIS CASE SOMETHING THAT WAS POSTED TO BE FUNNY- AS IN- NOT SERIOUS!!!!!!!

OMG I CANNOT BELIEVE YOU WENT TO PITT!!!!

NTF

While he has some valid points, he has some idiotic ones too. At the end of the day, he's a whore in it for the money, just like he rails against

Profound observation, f_b. It hadn't occurred to me to take this Dick Masterson anything less than 100% seriously.

Then maybe instead of leading into the story with "Not bad" you should have chosen "Bad" or "Dumb"

Honest to god bro, lighten the eff up

Happy as a clam here- You?

I'm wonderful. Thanks for caring f_b. Means alot.

My hero

quick show of hands- who's unfunnier?

Eddie Murphy

or the doof who posts three consecutive unfunny YouTube clips of tranny licker?

quick show of hands...

God you are dumb.



Somebody wanna tell him?

instead of another FB "u dont get it/im just kidding" post from you- howsah bout you address mister black panther himself jim brown and his last two or three sentences here- sir....

Jim Brown Suggests That Marijuana Was Involved In Stallworth Accident
Posted by Mike Florio on June 19, 2009, 11:05 p.m.
Hall of Fame running back Jim Brown, who remains a senior member of Cleveland Browns management, suggested on Friday that Browns receiver Donte’ Stallworth was smoking marijuana on the evening/morning of the accident that claimed the life of 59-year-old Mario Reyes.

Brown made his remarks during an appearance on 790 The Ticket’s The Dan LeBatard Show.

“This situation is a tragedy all around, but what was involved was alcohol and marijuana,” Brown said. “On one hand, DUI is a very serious thing in America. Marijuana of course is against all the rules.”

Brown explained that he has some “inside information that says that that was also a part of what was detected,” presumably in the blood test imposed on Stallworth. Brown said he’s not “100 percent sure” that this is true, but Brown said he spoke with a “very reliable source” who shared this information.

Brown described Stallworth as “very fortunate” on a couple of occasions, given the relatively lenient sentence imposed.

Brown also said he has spoken to Commissioner Roger Goodell, and that Goodell indicated a sincere desire to combat the off-field issues that have been occurring. Brown pointed to the “hip hop culture” as the root of the problem, and he blamed agents for failing to help players become responsible citizens, and the absence of fathers from the lives of many black children during their formative years.

“The black father is not in the home, and that male influence — that biological male influence — is not there,” Brown said. “And if you don’t have surrogate fathers that are gonna step in, then these kids are basically on their own.”

instead of another FB "u dont get it/im just kidding" post from you- howsah bout you address mister black panther himself jim brown and his last two or three sentences here- sir....

How about YOU address the fact that the vids I posted are NOT Eddie Murphy- and the fact that you seem strangely preoccupied with licking trannies and gerbil anatomy

you;ll have to pardon me for summarily skipping your youtube 'classics' 'ex-pecially' when they're posted 1 on top of the other.

i learned years ago holmie.

No problem.


We pardon you everytime you try and arbitrate what's funny or unfunny, or when you fly off the handle without knowing anything of what you are talking about- it's like clockwork

I don't understand the Stallworth uproar. Does anyone understand the exact situation or have the facts of the case come out? If you grant the fact that a pedestrian could be fully at fault for getting themselves killed by a driver that was not under the influence at all (which happens) then why do people assume that just because someone was over the limit that they were at fault and therefore should do hard time?

Rich football player named Donte' runs over husband and father - who was leaving work on the graveyard shift to catch a bus - in broad daylight in his Bentley after a night out.

Don't know, sounds like a few hot buttons are struck here.... if the victim was white Nancy Grace might have exploded.

This maybe the biggest PUSSY of all time!

I don't understand the Stallworth uproar. Does anyone understand the exact situation or have the facts of the case come out? If you grant the fact that a pedestrian could be fully at fault for getting themselves killed by a driver that was not under the influence at all (which happens) then why do people assume that just because someone was over the limit that they were at fault and therefore should do hard time?

Here's what we know (undisputed facts):

- Driving drunk (nearly twice the legal limit).
- Speeding.
- Hits sober pedestrian coming home from work and killed him.
- He had enough time to flash his lights and honk his horn at the pedestrian, but not slow down of turn the wheel.
- Admitted full guilt for all of the above.

Here's what we also know:

- He came to a financial settlement with the family.
- The family told the prosecuters not to pursue the case and to accept a plea.

For all of the above, he got 30 days of jail time and he'll likely searve about 2 weeks of that.

I guess I'm a little surprised you're surprised, GGB. Seems like an open and shut case of a poor family taking hush money to handcuff the prosecuters after his legal team made it clear they'd keep this case open for years with loopholes and appeals.

I know it's nitpicking, but he was NOT "nearly twice the legal limit." Not sure why that keeps getting stated. Limit is .08, he was .12.

Just sayin.

Tons of unintentional comedy - don't know where to start.

"His manager, who I KNEW from behind..."

I know it's not in context (or maybe it is?), but that's just.......dude needs an editor.

If you grant the fact that a pedestrian could be fully at fault for getting themselves killed by a driver that was not under the influence at all (which happens) then why do people assume that just because someone was over the limit that they were at fault and therefore should do hard time?

Would a normal person not get less than 30 days if he was in the same spot?

I know it's nitpicking, but he was NOT "nearly twice the legal limit." Not sure why that keeps getting stated. Limit is .08, he was .12.

Just sayin.

I've seen up to .14 and never below .12xxx, but he was closer to double the legal limit than the legal limit regardless.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 
31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 
61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75  76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 
91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 
121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 
151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163