Promote your business or product on 700level.com. For
more information about advertising with us CLICK HERE!

Anyone who didn't use their position and fame to get some strange and have a bastard love child would be a little suspect, I think

Looks like the National Enquirer was right all along.

Amazing how many people are surprised that one of the biggest slimeballs on the face of the earth is, well, a slimeball. The guy who preached about "two Americas" while living in a multi-million dollar home, the guy who uses his wife's cancer in his campaign while he's fucking someone else.

Thank goodness the National Enquirer stuck to their guns on this, this clown had a good shot at being Attorney General under a Barry administration.

What law did he break, I forgot.


I know he cheated on his wife, and sinned.


Please tell us, oh BMA, Mr. Glass House!

Mr. Perfect, please tell us why all your sins (not criminal record mind you) shouldn't be a consideration when you're applying for that next pizza delivery job...


More smoke and mirrors- who effin cares anyways?


People who point fingers for a living, that's who.


BMA, you're no better than Al Sharpton.

And I mean that.

SO- let's recap:


Democrats lie about cheating on their wives with strange women and stealing thousands of dollars and sticking it in their refrigerators.


Republicans lie about cheating on their wives with strange men and stealing millions of dollars and sticking it in their offshore accounts.



YOU MAKE THE CALL

Why am I not surprised to see FB defending a scumbag?

I am surprised that you haven't tried to blame this on Obama yet!

Oh, my bad.


OBAMINATION

Seriously-

Is the child half-black? Come on BMA, I'm sure you can steal someone's quote on this?

LOL @ FBSharpton with post after post of drivel.

LOL???///OMFG!!!???///XOXOXO

Kind of a unappealing broad. And he denies knocking her up to boot.

My bet is he is going to be a new Daddy.

You would think a dude with his prestige could snag a better quality piece of ass.

Of course Monica Lewinsky was a pig so maybe not.
link

link

She looks like Gunnar Nelson with floppy tits.

Obamination's fans come from unlikely walks of life
Yo, click it

Your point is what.....?

He's a dweeb, we know. But he's our dweeb. The dweeb with a plan. Unlike the dork with a plan we had the last two times (Gore & Kerry). Or the putz (Dukakis). Or the nerd (Mondale).

FF, though.

No point. Just thought it was funny.












heathen.

zealot

More evidence Barry has no clue about the economy:
link

By the way, I fully expect the option of "Pass" to be added to the debates so neither of these 2 clowns have to stammer around regarding any questions about the economy. These debates can't get here soon enough.

That is a really bad idea.

BMA, I have no idea what to think about less taxation on senior citizens, but just a few lines in, I read this:

"The odds are the retired folks - they're getting pensions, they're getting Social Security, they have investment assets, they own a house - so ... they're better off than somebody who is 30 or 40 years younger who's trying to buy a house (and) trying to start saving," said Clint Stretch, managing principal of tax policy for Deloitte Tax.

"The odds are"? If a senior citizen has a pension, investments, and a paid off house, they likely have more than $50K per year in income. I think the idea here is helping people who have some or none of those things.

Yes, young families tend to have more financial needs, but seniors with fixed often face financial catastrophe. With inflation, property tax, and a fixed income, they aren't always living like Kings.

There are a TON of seniors in this country who were blue-collar, non-union workers with no pension, little money invested (because they didn't have money to invest), and living in a small house or apartment. I don't think trying to help them would be a bad idea.

Yikes.

I can appreciate finding ways to ease burdens, but some seniors have money in pre-tax funds and never paid tax on that income.

Any Obama supporters see this in his economic plan before? Who signed off on this or was this an off-the-cuff thing? How will he dig himself out of this, because I'm sure Congress won't be pleased about voting on this, especially if they are held to some pay-go policy.

Clear case of pandering to a large voting sect.

Clear case of pandering to a large voting sect.

Totally agree.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 
31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 
61 62 63 64 65  66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 
91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 
121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 
151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 
181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207