
|
KeithByars
RE: Bears Game Discussion?
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/23/2007 10:09 AM
|

|

|

|
Yeah, you did
|

|
|

|

|
f-dallas
RE: Bears Game Discussion?
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/23/2007 10:09 AM
|

|

|

|
It seemed like you were implying you were seeing something that wasn't blatantly obvious to everyone.
|

|
|

|

|
Fred_Barnett
RE: Bears Game Discussion?
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/23/2007 10:13 AM
|

|

|

|
It seemed like you were implying you were seeing something that wasn't blatantly obvious to everyone.
Well I'm glad that it is now
|

|
|

|

|
f-dallas
RE: Bears Game Discussion?
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/23/2007 10:15 AM
|

|

|

|
Huh?
|

|
|

|

|
KeithByars
RE: Bears Game Discussion?
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/23/2007 10:17 AM
|

|

|

|
I get the feeling there are actually about 5 real posters on the board, and the rest are figments of one of our dastardly contributors. Especially after interactions like these.
|

|
|

|

|
f-dallas
RE: Bears Game Discussion?
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/23/2007 10:19 AM
|

|

|

|
I was just thinking the same thing.
|

|
|

|

|
Fred_Barnett
RE: Bears Game Discussion?
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/23/2007 10:19 AM
|

|

|

|
I'm just fucking around f-d- sometimes I think some of our esteemed posters take things (including themselves) a bit too seriously
|

|
|

|

|
f-dallas
RE: Bears Game Discussion?
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/23/2007 10:19 AM
|

|

|

|
No I wasn't.
|

|
|

|

|
f-dallas
RE: Bears Game Discussion?
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/23/2007 10:20 AM
|

|

|

|
FB, pardon me if I take myself too seriously, but I didn't get the joke.
I was just honestly confused.
|

|
|

|

|
Fred_Barnett
RE: Bears Game Discussion?
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/23/2007 10:22 AM
|

|

|

|
Since the butt of the joke isn't even here, that's understandable.
THE END
|

|
|

|

|
NotoriousEAG
RE: Bears Game Discussion?
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/23/2007 10:52 AM
|

|

|

|
I only post under NotoriousEAG, Daddysly, and Seth in 736
|

|
|

|

|
munchdaddy
RE: Bears Game Discussion?
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/23/2007 10:57 AM
|

|

|

|
I'm actually Josh and Woodie...
|

|
|

|

|
Fred_Barnett
RE: Bears Game Discussion?
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/23/2007 11:18 AM
|

|

|
|
|

|

|
flesh4fantasy
RE: Bears Game Discussion?
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/23/2007 11:26 AM
|

|

|

|
FB, were you or were you not implying that you were the first to notice the eagles lacked playmakers and everyone else is just figuring it out?
because if that is your idea of a "joke", there's a youtube clip in another thread of a middle-aged mom doing a sing-along that you might find funny.
|

|
|

|

|
KeithByars
RE: Bears Game Discussion?
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/23/2007 11:27 AM
|

|

|

|
That has nothing to do with your "joke"
|

|
|

|

|
munchdaddy
RE: Bears Game Discussion?
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/23/2007 11:28 AM
|

|

|

|
because if that is your idea of a "joke", there's a youtube clip in another thread of a middle-aged mom doing a sing-along that you might find funny.
Bwaaah!
excellent, well played.
|

|
|

|

|
flesh4fantasy
RE: Bears Game Discussion?
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/23/2007 11:31 AM
|

|

|

|
thanks munch, i try to work in a reference about that clip whenever possible.
|

|
|

|

|
Fred_Barnett
RE: Bears Game Discussion?
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/23/2007 11:31 AM
|

|

|

|
FB, were you or were you not implying that you were the first to notice the eagles lacked playmakers and everyone else is just figuring it out?
I was not implying that I was the first.
There were others.
What I was doing was taking a shot a Seth. What's so hard to understand?
Honestly, people.
|

|
|

|

|
KeithByars
RE: Bears Game Discussion?
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/23/2007 11:33 AM
|

|

|

|
In fairness to Fred, this was funny
You cant cite a poorly formed argument of mine, a homeristic or irrationally WIP fueled argument posted out here 1 way or the other-
|

|
|

|

|
KeithByars
RE: Bears Game Discussion?
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/23/2007 11:34 AM
|

|

|

|
FB, Seth didn't say the Eagles had a ton of playmakers. In that post, he clearly says that many teams that are successful don't have a ton of playmakers.
|

|
|

|

|
Fred_Barnett
RE: Bears Game Discussion?
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/23/2007 11:37 AM
|

|

|

|
Where did I say that Seth said the Eagles had a ton a playmakers? I never said anything remotely like that.
|

|
|

|

|
KeithByars
RE: Bears Game Discussion?
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/23/2007 11:38 AM
|

|

|

|
Do you even know what you're talking about?
|

|
|

|

|
Fred_Barnett
RE: Bears Game Discussion?
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/23/2007 11:39 AM
|

|

|

|
In that post, he clearly says that many teams that are successful don't have a ton of playmakers.
And I stressed that Westbrook (as the team's sole playmaker) wasn't going to be enough, given McNabb's "consistency and accuracy".
|

|
|

|

|
Fred_Barnett
RE: Bears Game Discussion?
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/23/2007 11:40 AM
|

|

|

|
Do you even know what you're talking about?
Yes- but I don't know what you're talking about.
|

|
|

|

|
KeithByars
RE: Bears Game Discussion?
|

|
Reply
|

|
10/23/2007 11:40 AM
|

|

|

|
Your whole "joke" was centered around the fact that you knew the team lacked playmakers, and others didn't. Then, when called out, you mentioned it was Seth that you were referring to.
Then, you link to a post in which Seth mentions that many teams don't have playmakers.
What in the hell are you trying to say.
|

|
|

|
|
|