
|
gowdemon
TO in Porn
|

|
Reply
|

|
4/22/2008 4:16 PM
|

|

|
|
|

|

|
f-dallas
RE: TO in Porn
|

|
Reply
|

|
4/22/2008 4:24 PM
|

|

|

|
I saw that earlier and in a complete shocker, T.O. appears to be looking at the eye candy in the Jeep, not next to it.
|

|
|

|

|
NCSaintsFan
RE: TO in Porn
|

|
Reply
|

|
4/22/2008 4:27 PM
|

|

|

|
Is that Matt Leinart in the Jeep?
|

|
|

|

|
Bird_inSkinCountry
RE: TO in Porn
|

|
Reply
|

|
4/22/2008 4:31 PM
|

|

|

|
Im w/ FD on this one. It is really hard to determine with his Poncharello glasses, but clearly the two are sharing a magical smile together.
|

|
|

|

|
Bird_inSkinCountry
RE: TO in Porn
|

|
Reply
|

|
4/22/2008 4:32 PM
|

|

|

|
Oh yeah... love the URL paste job. I knew I refused to learn HTML for a reason!! Johnson/Uber and the gang... Bravo Zulu!!!
|

|
|

|

|
TheTalon
RE: TO in Porn
|

|
Reply
|

|
4/22/2008 11:59 PM
|

|

|

|
Interestingly enough, T.O. is no longer in the shot on the BangBros.com page.
|

|
|

|

|
stripsearchband
RE: TO in Porn
|

|
Reply
|

|
4/23/2008 9:46 AM
|

|

|

|
That's some funny stuff. Someone probably said he was a big D**K and they misunderstood.
|

|
|

|

|
Eagle-in-DC
RE: TO in Porn
|

|
Reply
|

|
4/23/2008 10:00 AM
|

|

|

|
SSB?! Holy crap. BTW...I still have a crooked pinky from that wobbly assed throw at the FREDDIE MITCHELL draft party.
|

|
|

|

|
munchdaddy
RE: TO in Porn
|

|
Reply
|

|
4/23/2008 10:03 AM
|

|

|

|
It appears as though after all the scuzzlebutt,
TO has been cropped from the picture.
TO was 100% checking out the dude in the jeep.
linc
|

|
|

|

|
stripsearchband
RE: TO in Porn
|

|
Reply
|

|
4/23/2008 10:05 AM
|

|

|

|
Sorry bout the pass man. My incredible guilt over the pain I inflicted is the sole reason I've retired from QBing. It's taken years of therapy to get over it, and the Freddie Mitchell pick.
|

|
|

|

|
TheHulk_NJ
RE: TO in Porn
|

|
Reply
|

|
4/23/2008 10:21 AM
|

|

|

|
SSB? BLAST FROM THE PAST!!!
Getting the band back together........
|

|
|

|

|
Seth in 736
RE: TO in Porn
|

|
Reply
|

|
4/23/2008 10:31 AM
|

|

|

|
Hulk- methinks i no longer have valid contact info for you.
Can you either hit me up if you still have my e mail address or get current stuff to Scotty?
Thanks.
|

|
|

|

|
TheHulk_NJ
RE: TO in Porn
|

|
Reply
|

|
4/23/2008 10:48 AM
|

|

|

|
I will send through the boys. If its in regards to the draft I know I will NOT be here this weekend. Just FYI.
|

|
|

|

|
Seth in 736
RE: TO in Porn
|

|
Reply
|

|
4/23/2008 10:49 AM
|

|

|

|
Thx- send it thru to Scotty. Cool on the draft.
|

|
|

|

|
silver_n_blue
RE: TO in Porn
|

|
Reply
|

|
4/24/2008 9:24 AM
|

|

|

|
Ive rubbed one off to this site more than once. BTW, the site looks good!!!
|

|
|

|

|
Seth in 736
RE: TO in Porn
|

|
Reply
|

|
4/29/2008 8:53 AM
|

|

|

|
EAGLES SUE T.O.
Posted by Mike Florio on April 29, 2008, 7:21 a.m.
The Philadelphia Eagles have ripped a scab from an old wound, by filing a lawsuit against receiver Terrell Owens.
The move is a mere formality, aimed at enforcing an arbtritation award that the Eagles secured earlier in the year regarding Owens’ obligation to repay bonus money based on his conduct in 2005, which culminated in a four-game suspension for conduct detrimental to the team. The suit was required because Owens has reportedly ignored efforts by the team to recover the money.
The team thereafter sent him home with pay, but withheld the checks and applied them to the total bonus repayment obligation of $1.7 million. It left a difference of $769,117, which Owens must pay out of his own pocket.
The Eagles’ only request of the federal court in which the matter was filed will be to convert the arbitration award into a valid judgment, which the team would then use as the basis to pursue Owens’ assets.
Once the judgment is entered, the Eagles can attempt to recover the money in any jurisdiction where Owens has assets, by asking the courts in such jurisdictions to recognize the judgment. In most cases, it’s a fairly automatic procedure.
And someone who should be paying particular attention to this is Bengals receiver Chad Johnson. If he follows through on his threat to hold out and/or retire, he eventually could be required to write an even bigger check to the Bengals.
Surprisingly, we’ve heard nothing from Johnson since the Bengals didn’t trade him over the weekend. Maybe that’s because the team that was chasing him — the Redskins — drafted two of the highest-rated receivers.
***************************************
A mere formality, but I chuckled.
|

|
|

|
|
|