
|
eaglegurl
seth
|

|
Reply
|

|
6/21/2004 9:53 AM
|

|

|

|
why won't you get over it?
sure, i harrassed eagle's fans. but there were no evil or malicious intentions. in fact, if you think back you might recall that it was in response to my personal information being displayed.
|

|
|

|

|
munchdaddy
RE: seth
|

|
Reply
|

|
6/21/2004 10:45 AM
|

|

|

|
Seth,
I think we all need to write a big thank you letter to the Florida media hack that brought us EG by advertising this site. I post to other message boards and there are some eg’s out there, but threads don’t take the wild turns like they do here because people just ignore these little pathetic outcries for attention (which I am fueling right now by even talking about this idiot). Here for some reason certain people just can’t lay off and that is what is ruining threads. We have long time posters encouraging and fueling this crap on an almost daily basis. In fact, these same people have made this place less entertaining even when EG was banned. I realize the personal issue you have with this. Lines were crossed and I certainly don’t blame you or others that were harassed. But now, this has moved into ignore it and it will go away mode. Maybe if we all chip in and donate some money, the guys can find the time and people to install an ignore feature like other sites have. I have a short list of who would be immediately added. Until such time, be your own ignore police and if others who have added some value here do the same, maybe the thread ruining will improve.
|

|
|

|

|
Seth in 736
RE: seth
|

|
Reply
|

|
6/21/2004 10:52 AM
|

|

|

|
Munch-
It is not just a S736 issue, for 1. I appreciate your suggested method, and again, Im all for the non ban policy that has been here since inception.
I think that this place being so diferent ( level vs other sites) is 1 reason why this creatin should go. It sends a message, both to "would be" EGs, and more importantly the day to day users of the site.
This guy doesnt follow the normal pattern of "ignore and he will go away".
It detracts from peoples enjoyment of the site. And I am not certain what you mean by certain regs making the site less enjoyable, I honestly dont, but are you sayin that his being banned in the winter was a bad thing? Do you feel he added something to the site?
|

|
|

|

|
munchdaddy
RE: seth
|

|
Reply
|

|
6/21/2004 10:56 AM
|

|

|

|
He, she, it adds nothing. The certain regulars that I am talking about are ones who:
A. Keep responding to this idiot.
B. Turn every thread into an insult match or pissing contest even when EG wasn’t here.
Ban him, fine. But there will be more just like him. It is inevitable. Trolls leave when they aren’t acknowledged.
|

|
|

|

|
eaglegurl
RE: seth
|

|
Reply
|

|
6/21/2004 11:13 AM
|

|

|

|
the ignore feature you suggested sounds like a great idea, munch. each user could essentially select who they will or won't listen to.
|

|
|

|

|
eaglegurl
RE: seth
|

|
Reply
|

|
6/21/2004 11:20 AM
|

|

|

|
Bottom line- you displayed traits that go far beyond internet "rabble rouser"- you stalked, harrassed, committed identity fraud, insinuated yourself into peoples personal lives-involving their families.
stalked? who the hell did i stalk?
harrassed? sure.
committed identity fraud? give me a break, man. you act like i stole your credit card number or something. all of my actions associated with getting your phone number were a result of you and d-sly possessing/posting my personal info.........you always seem to ignore that fact. it's not as if i just decided to mess with seth more than anyone else here. you and d-sly made every effort to be leaders in the charge to try and make me leave. and it resulted in your posting my information because you were sick of my antics shortly after the 02 nfc championship game.
insinuated myself into other's personal lives? maybe you can explain that one a little better.
|

|
|

|

|
Seth in 736
RE: seth
|

|
Reply
|

|
6/21/2004 12:08 PM
|

|

|

|
This is my last response to you, and its more for those here who don't know the whole thing.
(By the way, I never obtained nor posted your info. here- i maintain this tho you repeatedly ignore that fact.)
You didnt just target me, there were at least 3 others here whom you caused crap for/sought info on/contacted beyond this site.
You know who they are, they know it, they just chose not to make this public.
and according to the Police down your way, and apparently up here, you certainly did commit a crime, actually 2. I won't go into all that again either. You apparently knew you committed a crime as well, otherwise why the intricate scheme to nulify one guys' testimony with electronic evidence that would paint him as your co conspirator?
|

|
|

|

|
eaglegurl
RE: seth
|

|
Reply
|

|
6/21/2004 1:04 PM
|

|

|

|
toying with woodie is all i was doing. leading him to believe i had recorded a phone conversation we had (in which he did conspire to play tricks on the level, etc.) was all in fun. there were no such emails or whatever you're talking about designed to serve as evidence.
another thing before you go..........since you seem to be vowing to not address me anymore.......why do you continue to make fun of the cinderblock being thrown through my window?
|

|
|

|

|
Seth in 736
RE: seth
|

|
Reply
|

|
6/21/2004 1:26 PM
|

|

|

|
toying with woodie is all i was doing. leading him to believe i had recorded a phone conversation we had (in which he did conspire to play tricks on the level, etc.) was all in fun. there were no such emails or whatever you're talking about designed to serve as evidence.
I lied, here's another response- not only do I Have these e mails which dont exist, but so do the appropriate authorities you tool bag!
|

|
|

|

|
eaglegurl
RE: seth
|

|
Reply
|

|
6/21/2004 1:31 PM
|

|

|

|
believe what you want to believe, seth.
keep thinking i'm stalking you or what the eff ever. it's ridiculous.
|

|
|

|

|
Seth in 736
RE: seth
|

|
Reply
|

|
6/21/2004 3:19 PM
|

|

|

|
Never said youre still doing anything, other than suck up trying to stick on an Iggles site.
Die.
|

|
|

|

|
eaglegurl
RE: seth
|

|
Reply
|

|
6/21/2004 3:31 PM
|

|

|

|
i'll outlive you seth. just for spite.
|

|
|

|

|
eaglegurl
RE: seth
|

|
Reply
|

|
6/21/2004 4:09 PM
|

|

|

|
Hey, I didnt expand until prompted. I simply said that we'd leave it at that.
If ya never called me at work, it wouldnt have crossed my mind.
yeah, i called you at work. once. i didn't call you repeatedly. i wasn't rude to you. it was in fun.
give me a break, man.
|

|
|

|

|
Seth in 736
RE: seth
|

|
Reply
|

|
6/21/2004 5:00 PM
|

|

|

|
Also a lie.
Left 1 voice mail.
Called me again, I answered knowing by the area code it was you- you froze, hung up.
Then called again to talk.
thats 3 that I know of.
|

|
|

|

|
eaglegurl
RE: seth
|

|
Reply
|

|
6/22/2004 12:40 AM
|

|

|

|
you know what the hell i meant.
|

|
|

|

|
chicklet
RE: seth
|

|
Reply
|

|
6/22/2004 11:07 AM
|

|

|

|
Asshole,
When you go out of your way to obtain information on a person (that they don't WANT you to have) with the INTENT to harass someone, THAT is a form of stalking. Whether it was harrassment or stalking is neither here nor there, BOTH are illegal and BOTH are grounds for obtaining a restraining or no contact order.
Did you or did you NOT go out of your way to find our phone number, and proceed to get my (then) 8 year old son on the phone to obtain Seth's WORK phone number so that you could leave voice mails? Did you or did you NOT do that? Did you NOT make threatening statements toward one 700Level.com users wife, thereby scaring her? Did you NOT threaten to show up in Philly on a gameday merely to start trouble?
It may have been harmless fun to YOU, idiot, but we don't exactly live in a day and age where you can trust that a stranger on an internet board isn't a psycho murderer. How you have the f'ing AUDACITY to come back here and expect to be taken seriously is amazing and just proves that you are so mentally unstable that you ARE scary.
|

|
|

|

|
Tattoo
RE: seth
|

|
Reply
|

|
6/22/2004 11:30 AM
|

|

|

|
Very well said chicklet, I expressed my opinion over the weekend to Hooky and Seth, and I will continue to ignore this vermin, but I wanted to give you the verbal pat on the back for that...
|

|
|

|

|
GoEagles
RE: seth
|

|
Reply
|

|
6/22/2004 11:40 AM
|

|

|

|
Seth and chicklet thanks for the history lesson. I was wondering what had happened with that pissant before that got him banned. I think the ignore it and it will go away method might just work if everyone just completely ignores any posts that asshole makes.
|

|
|

|

|
eaglegurl
RE: seth
|

|
Reply
|

|
6/22/2004 12:06 PM
|

|

|

|
threatening statements to someone's wife? what are you talking about?
i hardly said two words to your son. i asked if seth was there and he said no. then, without prompting and before i could say "ok, bye", he offered me seth's work number, "do you want to call him at work?".........all i said was "sure."
you paint a picture like i'm some kind of a monster. i was only horsing around. i'm sorry.
|

|
|

|

|
OTownEagle
RE: seth
|

|
Reply
|

|
6/23/2004 1:08 PM
|

|

|

|
Wow didn't know all this was going on I will make sure I ignore that jerk from now on.
|

|
|

|

|
GoEagles
RE: seth
|

|
Reply
|

|
6/23/2004 3:54 PM
|

|

|

|
Hopefully Otown others on the level that still acknowledge that assholes comments will read this thread and ignore him as well.
|

|
|

|

|
eaglegurl
RE: seth
|

|
Reply
|

|
6/23/2004 4:01 PM
|

|

|

|
speak english much? lol.
|

|
|

|

|
Airborne Eagle
RE: seth
|

|
Reply
|

|
6/25/2004 9:42 AM
|

|

|

|
Hopefully, Otown, others on the level that still acknowledge that asshole's comments will read this thread and ignore him as well.
So he didn't care about the punctuation. Seems clear to me what he's saying.
|

|
|

|

|
TheHulk_NJ
RE: seth
|

|
Reply
|

|
6/25/2004 10:06 AM
|

|

|

|
Hello. Aren't Otown and Eaglegurl good friends?
|

|
|

|

|
eaglegurl
RE: seth
|

|
Reply
|

|
6/25/2004 10:20 AM
|

|

|

|
no, i don't know otown.
thanks for the clarification, ae.
|

|
|

|
|
|